What is a standardized contract: A detailed guide

Many brands and industries are required, either by their business models or regulations to create and sign a vast number of contracts.

It would be impractical for these organizations to create a new contract every time so they rely on a standardized contract.

In this guide, you’ll learn what a standardized contract is, the key aspects of standardized contracts, and the advantages and challenges they bring to the table.

Understanding Standardized Contracts

Standardized contracts, also known as adhesion contracts or boilerplate contracts, are agreements that were drafted previously and have terms that aren’t altered. You either accept the terms or you don’t.

They’re used by many organizations to make transactions faster – they don’t have to deal with different contracts every time. Their compliance and legal teams have a consistent framework to deal with others.

Generally speaking, you see these contracts where there are many similar transactions, and negotiating contract terms would be impossible without significant overhead costs.

The common components of a standardized contract include uniform terms, little to no options for customization of the contract, and only one side drafts the contract to present to the other side. The person or group with more bargaining power is the one that dictates the terms of the agreement.

Naturally, you have boilerplate language that doesn’t take into consideration unique situations or preferences that may be relevant to the agreement.

Due to their standardized and boilerplate language, they often have exemption clauses, limitation of liability provisions, and other risk-shifting mechanisms to protect the party drafting the contract. After all, when the contract was created, the individual circumstances of the parties weren’t considered.

You’ll find them in places like banks that sign contracts with every customer or in agencies that have a high volume of customers that they sign contracts with. Standardized contracts can also be found in consumer transactions, insurance policies, employment agreements, software licenses, and online terms of service agreements.

For example, consumer contracts for mobile phones, credit cards, and internet services are typically standardized to facilitate rapid transactions and ensure consistency in the terms offered to customers.

Larger insurance companies that service retail consumers usually use standardized contracts in policy language to limit risk and provide a wide range of coverage. Larger institutional clients mau receive bespoke insurance agreements.

In the employment context, these contracts are used for company-wide terms of employment with minor changes for salaries. Only higher-ranked employees will receive a custom benefits package and contract.

Overall, understanding standardized contracts involves recognizing their role in facilitating efficient transactions, and the potential challenges they pose in terms of fairness, bargaining power, and the adequacy of contract terms.

While standardized contracts offer benefits in terms of efficiency and predictability, you should be aware of their limitations and take steps to ensure that the terms of the contract accurately reflect your intentions and interests.

Key Components of Standardized Contracts

Key components of standardized contracts include multiple elements. These elements determine the structure and function of a contract and guide the relationship that parties will have.

Standard terms and conditions

Every standardized contract has a set of standard terms and conditions. These terms or clauses indicate the obligations and rights of the signatories.

The hallmark of these standard terms is that they’re created in advance. They remain the same irrespective of the situation- they don’t change on a case-by-case basis. This makes it easier to conclude agreements without much negotiation. Oftentimes, there’s no negotiation.

These terms usually cover the important aspects of the agreement. It can include but isn’t limited to payment terms, delivery timeframes, and any type of dispute resolution. Though predictable, they cannot adapt to different situations.

Boilerplate clauses

These are standard provisions common in standardized contracts. They’re used to handle broad legal issues and potential risks. Oftentimes, the creator of these standardized contracts includes language to reduce or eliminate their liability.

It’s considered normal practice to draft them in generic language and include them in contracts without any changes. Sometimes these are legal requirements and at other times, it reflects what’s done in the industry.

Examples of boilerplate clauses include jurisdictional provisions, arbitration clauses, force majeure clauses, and entire agreement clauses.

The problem with boilerplate clauses is that they don’t address the needs of the specific situation. On the other hand, they provide some legal certainty about what the contract can handle.

Flexibility and customization options

This refers to the extent to which you can modify or tailor the terms of a standardized contract to better suit individual needs or preferences.

While standardized contracts are characterized by their uniformity and pre-determined terms, some contracts may allow for limited customization through the inclusion of optional provisions or the negotiation of certain terms.

You may also have the opportunity to select from predefined options or add supplemental agreements to address specific requirements or contingencies.

However, the degree of flexibility in standardized contracts varies depending on industry practices, the bargaining power of the parties, and the nature of the transaction.

While limited customization options can expedite contract execution and ensure consistency, carefully assess whether the standardized terms adequately address your particular circumstances and consider seeking legal advice or negotiating modifications where necessary.

The key components of standardized contracts encompass standard terms and conditions, boilerplate clauses, and flexibility or customization options, each contributing to the efficiency, predictability, and functionality of these widely used contractual instruments.

While standardized contracts offer benefits in terms of convenience and consistency, remain vigilant to ensure that the terms adequately reflect your intentions and interests, and consider seeking professional advice or negotiating modifications where necessary.

Advantages of Standardized Contracts

Standardized contracts offer several advantages that contribute to their widespread use and adoption across various industries and contexts.

Efficiency in contract drafting and negotiation:

Standardized contracts streamline the contract drafting and negotiation process by providing pre-determined terms and conditions that can be readily applied to multiple transactions.

This efficiency eliminates the need for you to negotiate every aspect of the contract from scratch, saving valuable time and resources.

By reducing the time and effort required to draft and negotiate contracts, standardized agreements enable you to focus on other critical aspects of the transaction, such as business strategy and relationship-building.

Consistency and predictability in contractual relationships:

One of the primary benefits of standardized contracts is the consistency and predictability they offer in contractual relationships.

Standard terms and conditions ensure uniformity across multiple transactions, promoting clarity and certainty for all parties involved.

This consistency helps minimize misunderstandings, disputes, and litigation by establishing clear expectations and obligations from the outset.

Moreover, standardized contracts make it easier to rely on established industry practices and precedents, further enhancing predictability and reducing uncertainty.

Cost-effectiveness and time-saving benefits:

By eliminating the need for extensive negotiation and customization, standardized agreements reduce legal fees, administrative costs, and overhead expenses associated with contract drafting and review.

Moreover, the efficiency gained from using standardized contracts allows you to expedite transactions and bring deals to fruition more quickly, enabling them to capitalize on opportunities and generate revenue sooner.

Additionally, the consistent application of standardized contracts can facilitate smoother transactions and improve operational efficiency over time, further enhancing cost-effectiveness and time-saving benefits.

Challenges and Limitations of Standardized Contracts

Standardized contracts, while offering efficiency and consistency, also present several challenges and limitations you should be aware of when entering into such agreements.

Lack of specificity and tailored provisions:

One of the primary challenges of standardized contracts is their lack of specificity and inability to address the unique circumstances or requirements of individual transactions.

Standardized agreements typically contain boilerplate language and pre-determined terms that may not fully capture the nuanced needs or preferences of the parties involved.

Important provisions may be overlooked or inadequately addressed, leading to potential gaps or ambiguities in the contract terms.

This lack of specificity can increase the risk of misunderstandings, disputes, and litigation, particularly in complex or high-stakes transactions where tailored provisions are essential to adequately address the parties’ interests.

This can be addressed by adding an addendum or even a contract rider to the agreement.

Risk of unfair or unbalanced terms:

Standardized contracts often favor the party with greater bargaining power, leading to the inclusion of terms that may be unfair or unbalanced.

Since standardized agreements are typically offered on a take-it-or-leave-it basis, those with limited negotiating leverage may be compelled to accept unfavorable terms that do not accurately reflect their interests or preferences.

This imbalance of bargaining power can result in the inclusion of exemption clauses, limitation of liability provisions, or other risk-shifting mechanisms that disproportionately favor the party drafting the contract.

As a result, you may find yourself bound by terms that are not mutually beneficial or reflective of your relative bargaining positions, leading to potential inequities and disputes.

Difficulty in accommodating unique circumstances or requirements:

Another limitation of standardized contracts is their limited flexibility in accommodating unique circumstances or requirements.

Since these agreements are designed to be applied uniformly across multiple transactions, they may not adequately address the specific needs or preferences of individual parties or transactions.

You may encounter difficulties in negotiating modifications or customizing the terms of standardized contracts to better suit particular circumstances.

This lack of flexibility can hinder your ability to tailor the contract to address specific risks, opportunities, or contingencies, potentially resulting in suboptimal outcomes or missed opportunities.

While standardized contracts offer efficiency and consistency, they also present challenges and limitations, including lack of specificity and tailored provisions, risk of unfair or unbalanced terms, and difficulty in accommodating unique circumstances or requirements.

Carefully assess these factors and consider seeking legal advice or negotiating modifications to mitigate potential risks and ensure that the terms of the contract adequately reflect their interests and objectives.

Legal Considerations for Standardized Contracts

Legal considerations for standardized contracts are paramount to ensure their enforceability, compliance with laws and regulations, and avoidance of potential pitfalls and areas of concern.

Enforceability of standardized contracts:

The enforceability of standardized contracts hinges on several factors, including the clarity and specificity of the contract terms, the presence of mutual assent between the parties, and adherence to applicable legal requirements.

Courts may scrutinize standardized contracts to ensure they are not unconscionable or contain unfair terms that violate public policy. Additionally, the incorporation process of standardized contracts, such as notice and acceptance procedures, may impact their enforceability.

Ensure that standardized contracts are drafted clearly and transparently, with provisions that are reasonable, fair, and in compliance with relevant legal standards to maximize enforceability.

Potential pitfalls and areas of concern:

Several potential pitfalls and areas of concern may arise in connection with standardized contracts, including:

• Ambiguities or inconsistencies in contract terms that could lead to disputes or litigation.
• Unfair or unbalanced provisions that disproportionately favor one party over the other.
• Inadequate risk allocation, such as insufficient limitation of liability or indemnification clauses.
• Lack of transparency regarding key terms and conditions, potentially leading to misunderstandings or dissatisfaction among the parties.
• Failure to update standardized contracts to reflect changes in legal requirements, industry standards, or business practices. To mitigate these risks, parties should regularly review and update standardized contracts to ensure they remain compliant with applicable laws, fair and equitable to all parties, and reflective of evolving business needs and practices.

Legal considerations for standardized contracts encompass their enforceability, compliance with laws and regulations, and potential pitfalls and areas of concern. Take proactive measures to ensure that standardized contracts are drafted, executed, and enforced in a manner that is legally sound, fair, and conducive to achieving the intended objectives of the parties involved.

Conclusion

Standardized contracts are tools used by organizations and individuals that create a large volume of contracts in the normal course of business.

They can improve efficiency and make sure the contracts created are consistent and cost-effective because they don’t need to be drafted from scratch every single time.

With that being said, they aren’t ideal in every situation so it’s important to assess when and how they can be used in the context of your organization.

Take advantage of DoxFlowy to create your standardized contracts in a fraction of the time and with less human error.

Let me know what you think in the comments and don’t forget to share.