Share on Facebook Tweet (Share on Twitter) Share on Linkedin

As your time becomes more precious or your organization grows, you won’t be able to do everything yourself

Instead, you’ll need to use agents to work on your behalf. These agents come in many shapes and forms and often have a lot of autonomy to do things like sign contracts.

These agreements that agents enter into on your behalf may need to be confirmed later in what’s known as a ratified contract.

In this guide, you’ll get a deeper understanding of what a ratified contract is, when it should be used, and how to ratify a contract.

What is a Ratified Contract?

A ratified contract is an agreement that has been validated or confirmed after its initial formation. It signifies acceptance or affirmation of agreements by one party, referred to as the principal, undertaken on their behalf by another party, the agent, without prior authorization.

The key characteristic of a ratified contract is that it represents an agreement that was not originally authorized but is later affirmed or adopted by the principal.

Despite the initial lack of authority, once ratified, the contract becomes legally binding between the parties involved, subject to the same principles and requirements as any other valid contract.

Elements required for a contract to be ratified:

For a contract to be ratified, several essential elements must be present. If these elements aren’t present, then the ratification may become difficult or even impossible in some cases:

Get rid of manual repetitive paperwork with robust document automation

LEARN MORE
  1. Agency relationship: Ratification typically arises in the context of an agency relationship, where one party (the agent) acts on behalf of another party (the principal) without prior authorization. The actions of the agent must have been undertaken on behalf of the principal.
  2. Knowledge and acceptance: The principal must have knowledge of the actions taken by the agent and must voluntarily accept or affirm those actions. Ratification cannot occur if the principal was unaware of the agent’s actions or if the principal does not expressly consent or imply consent to the contract.
  3. Intent to ratify: The principal must demonstrate a clear intent to ratify the contract, either explicitly through words or actions or implicitly through conduct consistent with acceptance of the contract’s terms.
  4. Legal capacity: Both parties (the principal and agent) must have the legal capacity to enter into a contract. This means they must be of legal age, mentally competent, and not under duress or undue influence at the time of ratification.

Key differences between ratified and non-ratified contracts:

The primary distinctions between ratified and non-ratified contracts lie in their formation, validation, and timing:

First, non-ratified contracts are formed through mutual consent and agreement between the parties at the time of contract formation.

In contrast, ratified contracts involve actions taken by one party (the agent) on behalf of another party (the principal) without prior authorization, followed by the principal’s acceptance or confirmation of those actions.

Next non-ratified contracts are valid from the moment of formation, provided all essential elements of a contract are present.

Ratified contracts, however, are initially voidable or unenforceable until the principal ratifies the contract by accepting or confirming the actions taken by the agent.

Lastly, non-ratified contracts are effective immediately upon formation, while ratified contracts become effective retroactively, from the time the agent took the actions, once the principal ratifies them.

A ratified contract represents an agreement that was initially unauthorized but later confirmed or adopted by the principal.

It requires an agency relationship, knowledge, and acceptance by the principal, intent to ratify, and legal capacity of the parties. The key differences between ratified and non-ratified contracts lie in their formation, validation, and timing of effectiveness.

When to Use a Ratified Contract

There aren’t hard and fast rules about when to use a ratified contract or not. With that being said, there are situations in which they’re more common which are listed below.

Make work faster with robust document templates

  1. Real estate transactions: Ratified contracts are frequently used in real estate transactions, particularly when agents or brokers act on behalf of buyers or sellers without explicit authorization.

In such cases, the actions taken by the agent, such as presenting offers or negotiating terms, may require subsequent ratification by the principal.

Ratified contracts provide a mechanism for confirming and formalizing the agreements reached during the negotiation process, ensuring clarity and certainty in the transaction.

  1. Employment agreements: Ratified contracts are also prevalent in employment agreements, especially in situations where hiring managers or human resources personnel extend offers or negotiate terms on behalf of employers.

If these representatives exceed their authority or make commitments that require approval from higher management, the agreements may need to be ratified by authorized decision-makers within the organization.

Ratified contracts help formalize the employment relationship, establish terms and conditions, and provide legal protection for both employers and employees.

  1. Business partnerships and collaborations: In the context of business partnerships and collaborations, ratified contracts are often used to formalize agreements reached during negotiations or discussions between parties.

For example, when representatives of two companies negotiate terms for a joint venture or collaboration, the resulting agreement may need to be ratified by the respective boards of directors, final contract manager, or authorized representatives before becoming legally binding.

Ratified contracts help ensure that all parties are in agreement and committed to the terms of the partnership or collaboration, minimizing the risk of misunderstandings or disputes.

Advantages of using ratified contracts in specific contexts:

Clarity and certainty: Ratified contracts provide clarity and certainty by formalizing agreements and confirming the intentions of the parties involved.

By ratifying contracts, principals acknowledge and accept the actions taken on their behalf, reducing the risk of misunderstandings or disputes regarding the terms of the agreement.

Legal validity: Ratified contracts are legally binding and enforceable once ratified by the principal, providing a solid foundation for enforcing rights and obligations under the agreement.

This legal validity helps protect your interests and provides recourse in the event of breaches or disputes.

Flexibility: Ratified contracts offer flexibility in negotiating and finalizing agreements, allowing you to reach agreements through agents or representatives while ensuring that final approval is obtained from authorized decision-makers.

This flexibility facilitates efficient decision-making and contract execution, particularly in complex or time-sensitive transactions.

Potential drawbacks and limitations of ratified contracts

  • Delay: One potential drawback of using ratified contracts is the delay in the contract negotiation and approval process. Ratification requires additional steps beyond the initial agreement, such as obtaining approval from principals or decision-makers, which can prolong the timeline for finalizing the contract.
  • Complexity: Ratified contracts may introduce complexity, particularly in situations involving multiple parties or hierarchical decision-making structures. Coordinating the ratification process and obtaining approvals from all necessary stakeholders can be challenging, especially in large organizations or complex transactions.
  • Risk of non-ratification: There is a risk that contracts may not be ratified by the principal, particularly if there are disagreements or changes in circumstances after the initial agreement. In such cases, the contract may be voidable or unenforceable, potentially leading to disputes or legal challenges.

Ratified contracts are commonly used in real estate transactions, employment agreements, and business partnerships to formalize agreements reached through agents or representatives.

Document and customer insights at your fingertips

LEARN MORE

They offer advantages such as clarity, legal validity, and flexibility, but may also present drawbacks such as delay, complexity, and the risk of non-ratification.

It’s essential to consider the specific circumstances and objectives of each transaction when deciding whether to use a ratified contract.

How to Create and Ratify a Contract

There are three overarching steps involved in the contract creation and ratification process that must be followed. They’re listed below.

The first step in drafting a ratified contract is to identify the parties involved and their respective roles and responsibilities. This includes specifying who will act as the principal and who will act as the agent, if applicable.

Additionally, it’s essential to define the scope of authority granted to the agent and any limitations on their ability to bind the principal.

Once the parties have been identified, the next step is to specify the terms and conditions of the contract.

This includes outlining the rights, obligations, and responsibilities of each party, as well as any specific actions or commitments that may require ratification by the principal.

The terms and conditions should be clear, unambiguous, and comprehensive, covering all relevant aspects of the agreement.

Consideration is a fundamental element of any contract, representing something of value exchanged between the parties.

In a ratified contract, consideration may take the form of promises, payments, services, or other benefits exchanged between the parties.

Get essential documents signed in a flash

It’s essential to establish consideration that is sufficient, legal, and mutually agreed upon by the parties involved.

Ensuring legal enforceability:

To ensure the legal enforceability of a ratified contract, it’s crucial to comply with all applicable laws and regulations governing contract formation and execution.

This includes ensuring that the contract complies with relevant statutory requirements, such as those related to capacity, legality, and formalities.

Additionally, you should consider any industry-specific regulations or standards that may impact the contract’s validity or enforceability.

Another key aspect of ensuring the legal enforceability of a ratified contract is to consider potential disputes and contingencies that may arise during the contract’s term. This includes identifying and addressing potential areas of disagreement, ambiguity, or uncertainty in the contract language.

You should also include provisions for resolving disputes and addressing contingencies, such as force majeure clauses, dispute resolution mechanisms, or termination provisions.

Creating and ratifying a contract involves several key steps, including identifying parties and their roles, specifying terms and conditions, and establishing consideration.

To ensure the legal enforceability of the contract, strive to comply with applicable laws and regulations and consider potential disputes and contingencies.

By following these steps and considerations, you can create ratified contracts that are legally valid, enforceable, and provide a solid foundation for their business relationships.

Ratification process and formalities

  1. Signing and execution:

The ratification process of a contract typically involves signing and executing the agreement by the principal after actions have been taken on their behalf by an agent.

Take advantage of AI-powered document drafting to move 4X faster

LEARN MORE

Once the agent has negotiated terms or entered into agreements on behalf of the principal, the principal must formally approve or ratify those actions for the contract to become legally binding.

This approval is usually indicated by the principal signing the contract or providing explicit consent to the terms agreed upon by the agent.

In some cases, the ratification process may involve additional formalities, such as obtaining signatures from witnesses or notarization to authenticate the document.

The manner of execution and formalities required may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the nature of the contract.

However, the key aspect is that the principal’s approval or ratification is documented in writing and made evident through signatures or other formal means.

  1. Documentation and record-keeping:

Documentation and record-keeping are important aspects of the ratification process to ensure clarity, transparency, and legal validity.

Automate contracts and workflows

Once the contract has been ratified, it should be documented and recorded in writing to provide evidence of the parties’ intentions and commitments.

This documentation typically includes a copy of the ratified contract signed by the principal, along with any supporting documentation or correspondence related to the ratification process.

Proper record-keeping is crucial for maintaining a clear and accurate record of the contract’s formation and ratification. This includes retaining copies of all relevant documents, such as correspondence, meeting minutes, and authorization forms, as well as any changes or amendments made to the contract during the ratification process. These records serve as a reference point for the parties involved and may be necessary to resolve disputes or enforce the contract in the future.

In addition to internal record-keeping, you may also need to comply with regulatory or statutory requirements regarding the retention and storage of contract documents.

This may include maintaining records for a specified period or ensuring that documents are stored securely to prevent loss, tampering, or unauthorized access.

Overall, the ratification process and formalities involve signing and executing the contract by the principal, along with proper documentation and record-keeping to ensure legal validity and enforceability. By following these steps and maintaining accurate records, parties can create ratified contracts that provide a solid foundation for their business relationships and transactions.

Conclusion

Ratified contracts are useful tools to take advantage of multiple opportunities but stay in charge of the final say.

It allows you to work hand in hand with agents to ensure your interests are protected. While there are many benefits, there are a few downsides such as the contract being voidable and it taking longer to complete a deal.

Make sure you take the time to understand what ratified contracts are, how they can be used, and the various requirements as outlined in this guide.

Let me know what you think in the comments and don’t forget to share.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.